|
Sunday 17th October 2004
Altruistic (Post-Autistic) Economics
See draft download -
GEAU-Altruistically-Linked Utility 2004-06-04.doc
Title: Altruistic Economics - A Positive Alternative to
Capitalist Economics
Speaker: Dr. Robin Upton
Summary: Practice and theory of an Economic system to support
cooperation and personal trust networks.
Organisation: Altruists International - www.altruists.org
Longer Text:-
Dr. Upton will be presenting an economic system that replaces
the traditional notion of a single, centralised market place
with a
decentralised F2F (Friend2Friend) environment in which transactions
take place over a network of social relationships, supported
by personal trust. Altruistic economics is post-autistic in
the sense that it does not ignore individuals' care and affection
for others. By allowing people to explicitly state which people
are important to them, it replaces the classical notion of self-maximising
with an altruistic maximisation of the welfare of oneself and
ones friends. As well as explaining theoretical aspects, Dr.
Upton will be explaining the shift in mentality associated with
such a system. He will draw parallels with similar practical
projects underway, and set the issue in the context of emerging
networks of personal trust on the internet.
Robin Upton
Altruists International
www.altruists.org
Short Model Summary
I choose who my friends are and tell the (DEcentralised, computer-based)
system.
I also specify how much I care about them, as a number, which
means the following:
If I love Kevin 0.8, then I am indifferent between, say: Me
gaining £10 or Kevin gaining £8
If I love Terry 0.1, then I am indifferent between, say: Me
gaining £5 or Terry gaining £50 or Me losing $10
or Terry losing $500 etc.
Clearly, '£' is just an illustration - it could be a mixture
of normal money and/or CC.
In the model 'care' is an explicit measure of how much I perceive
our wellbeings as being tied together.
The model also includes the networking angle, so if I tie my
wellbeing to Mary's, and she ties hers to John's, then mine
is also tied to John's by default.
As for what this means in practice, well that depends on who
adopts this model. As I'm largely self-taught in this area,
I would value the views of some more traditionally trained economists
on this model. I developed it myself as part of the Friend2Friend
Gift Economy module, but would love to have more input, or find
others who could put it to good use. The PA-Econ stuff seems
to fit very nicely with it. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Robin Upton
Altruists International
www.altruists.org
esf2004@altruists.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
This project is a component of Altruists Internationals
Gift Economy project, which aims to establish a general purpose,
worldwide gift economy as an alternative to standard trading
systems.
Linked Utility Models
A linked utility model is a model of peoples utility that
explicitly models the connections between separate individuals
wellbeings. A linked utility model is based on the familiar
concept of a utility function to express an individuals
preferences. This is referred to as a personal utility function.
This is then modified by a linked utility function that incorporates
the utilities of others. This second (linking) layer allows
people to express their care for others.
Personal Utility
People declare their own (selfish) preferences, as a function
of the environment, denoted by the symbol x. In the standard
capitalist model (where there is no linked utility function),
it simply expresses supply and demand.
ui(x) = amount of is personal satisfaction with x (the
environment)
Linked Utility
In order to represent an individuals care for others,
the linked utility function reflects overall personal happiness
in the light both of the environment and of everyones
personal utilities:
U1i(x)= Fi(u1(x) ... uN(x))
Rationality requires that we make the following assumption about
U1i(x):
· Self-interest Strictly increasing in ui(x)
The following properties will probably prove popular for altruistic
utility functions:
· Continuity Tiny perturbations to the u.(x) or x will
not cause a large changes to U1i(x)
· Transparency Is easily interpreted by humans
· Simplicity Can be effectively computed
All three properties are observed by the function below:
U1i(x) = ·sijuj(x) = si1u1(x) + si2u2(x) + ... + siNuN(x)
The degree of sympathy, sij, is introduced as the emotional
closeness of j to i. Since the assumption of self-interest
implies sii>0, we can normalise it to 1. Under classical
economics, sij=0 for all jĜi. (No one cares about anyone else).
However, we extend the model by making another, more plausible,
assumption:
· Altruism For any i, there is jĜi, where sij>0 (everybody
loves someone)
Enlightened Utility
We now consider the connection individuals i and k, who are
only linked indirectly. i.e. sik=0, but for an intermediate
individual j, sij>0 and sjk>0. To capture the fact that
a boost in ks wellbeing would improve is wellbeing,
we introduce a new definition, doubly-linked utility, U2i(),
as follows:
U2i(x) = ·sijU1j(x) = si1U11(x) + si2 U12(x) + ... + siN U1N(x)
Now we define a series of utility functions, U1, U2, U3
to encompass more and more people as follows:
Enlightenment
|
Function Name |
Symbol |
Reach |
0
|
Personal Utility |
ui(x) |
Self only |
| 1 |
(Singly-)Linked Utility |
U1i(x) |
Self & Friends |
2
|
Doubly-Linked Utility |
U2i(x) |
Self, Friends & Friends of Friends (FOF) |
| 3 |
Trebly-Linked Utility |
U3i(x) |
Self, Friends, FOF & FOFOF |
For sufficiently large N, such a utility function would take
account of everyone in the network. In practice, users may wish
to choose smaller values of N, and the effective computability
requirement may mean values of N greater than about 4 require
excessive computations.
Summary
Having explained the role of the linked utility function, and
shown the classes of functions we will be using, we will now
extend the model by detailing the environment as including different
commodities, x1..xN. We will include scenarios in which individuals
make consumption and production decisions, and trade with one
another rationally, so as to maximise UEi(x), for different
E, noting that E=0 is a the familiar case of self-maximising
individuals. The only page that is so far online about it is
www.altruists.org/static/page.asp?id=334
PS: The reference of an excellent Money Info Site is:
www.WizardsOfMoney.org
- see also www.WizardsOfMoney.net
- download
|